🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has stated to have scraped millions of tracks from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to publish them publicly.

Possible Boost for AI Development

Observers noted the seeming data breach could aid artificial intelligence firms looking for data to develop their models.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million entries of metadata such as performer and album names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million tracks, stated that the leak did not represent its full inventory.

“We have located and disabled the nefarious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” said a company representative.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorized access found a third party collected public metadata and employed illicit tactics to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Stated Mission and Concerns

The streaming service does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for providing links to pirated books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group asserted the music files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a method of sharing large data files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “preserving humanity’s information and heritage”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ copyright, said the breached music would likely be used for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on illegally sourced material is sadly common in the tech sector, so this accessed music is almost certain to end up instructing AI models,” he stated.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to a large online archive, a vast online repository of copyrighted books that has allegedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to develop its AI models.

The co-founder of an AI startup posted on the professional network that members of the public could in principle “create their own private free version of the service”. The executive added it could also allow tech companies to “train on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Copyright has become a battleground between creatives, writers and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Proposals and Reactions

In the UK, creative professionals have raised concerns against a government proposal to let AI companies use protected work without permission unless the rights holder opts out. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the proposal has backed artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for science, research and technology informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The government has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by March 2025.